3 MAJOR REASONS: That No American Should Ever Vote For Hillary by Teri O'Brien

Article Type: 
Published Date: 
Thursday, October 27, 2016

Teri O'BrienNow that Vice President Joe “Stand Up Chuck” Biden has finally let people get some sleep at night by announcing that he will not be running for president after all, it’s pretty clear that the commie fossil who has gotten so much attention for the last several months will be the nominee. That’s sad news for Sen. Bernie Sanders, who no doubt thought that the big crowds he’s been drawing and Bill Maher’s endorsement, might win the day for him. No, it’s clear that the other commie fossil in the running for the Democrat nomination, Hillary Rodham Clinton, will be their standard bearer. (Of course, only after she overcomes the inevitable surge by Lincoln Chafee. Go metric system!)

What’s also clear is that she plans to use a play that has proven very successful for other radical leftists seeking to deceive low-information voters into pulling the lever for them; specifically, she will characterize her election as “historic” because she would be the first woman to be elected president of the United States. It should be obvious that any politician who says “vote for me! I'm a woman!” or “vote for me! I’m black!” should be automatically disqualified, but, sadly, history shows that those are winning arguments when presented to emotionally-driven and/or low IQ members of society. If we’ve learned anything over the last seven years it should be to never underestimate the power of stupid and/or ignorant people in large numbers.

As you know, Dear Clash Daily Reader, I consider you all the vanguard of those who understand that if we want to reverse the unfortunate direction of this country and pull us back from the abyss, it’s not enough for us to vote for constitutional conservatives. We have to educate our fellow citizens. The fact that Barack Obama could be elected while proudly declaring his past as a “community organizer” demonstrates how dumbed down a significant portion of the electorate has become. As Saul Alinsky explained, a “community organizer” is a person devoted to destroying the existing civil society and imposing wealth and income redistribution through iron-fisted government, which are policies completely at odds with the Constitution. Indeed, State Sen. Obama lamented the fact that the Constitution was horribly flawed because it limited the power of the federal government to impose wealth and income redistribution. The guy never hid his hostility for the Constitution. Yet he got elected, and for almost seven years we’ve had a communist in the White House. (We also have a communist mayor in New York City, but that’s an issue for another day.)

I am convinced that many of those who voted for this unqualified Marxist never connected those dots. It’s imperative that we do everything we can not to let that happen again. You know that Hillary Clinton is every bit as radical and represents as big a danger to this country as Barack Obama. Here are a few things to share with your less informed friends who might be considering “making history” by voting for her.

Hillary Wants to Ban Any Criticism of Her

The Left, including Barack Hussein Obama, Hillary Clinton and afore-mentioned commie fossil Sen. Bernie Sanders, all agree that the Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. FEC (2010) is one of the worst decisions in history. To hear them rant and rave about it, you’d have to conclude that it makes the Dred Scott decision an example of excellence in jurisprudence. Barack Obama even took the occasion of this decision to berate the Supreme Court at the 2010 State of the Union address. He stated, “Last week, the Supreme Court reversed a century of law[53] to open the floodgates for special interests—including foreign corporations—to spend without limit in our elections.” The Democrat apparatchiks in the Lame Stream Media picked up this talking point, and used it to brainwash people who get their information from the pretend news, leading many of these fools to demonize this decision without having the slightest clue what it was about.

Here’s the short, simple fact: Citizens United is a non-profit organization. Prior to the 2008 election, they wanted to air a documentary that they had produced, Hillary: the Movie, something that ran afoul of the heinous, anti-1st amendment McCain-Feingold law. During the oral argument of this case, the government’s attorney, Deputy Solicitor General Malcolm L. Stewart, argued that under the existing law, the government would have the right to not only ban movies, but ban books, if they contained even one sentence advocating the defeat of a particular candidate. Fortunately, the Supreme Court ruled that it was unconstitutional for the government to ban political speech. Not only is Citizens United a victory for the First Amendment, something that the Left hopes you don’t notice. Hillary told supporters in Iowa, “I will do everything I can do to appoint Supreme Court justices who will protect the right to vote and not the right of billionaires to buy elections.”  What she should have said is, “I will appoint political hacks who will make sure it’s illegal to criticize me.”

Hillary Wants to Confiscate Your Guns

It’s not just the First Amendment that Hillary wants to eviscerate. Recently Hillary invoked the example of Australia to support her desire to blow her nose on the 2nd Amendment.

Speaking at Keene State College in New Hampshire, Clinton was asked if the U.S. should try to take away everyone’s handguns, as Australia once did. Clinton responded by praising Australia’s gun buyback in 1996 and 1997, when the government outlawed guns and then used registration lists to identify who owned these newly prohibited weapons. Clinton also praised Canada and the UK, which used similar registration laws to confiscate guns.

But wait. Does Hillary know how that Australia thing worked out? From Dr. Miguel A. Faria, Jr. writing in Surgical Neurology International:

Australians learned the lessons of indiscriminate, draconian gun control laws the hard way. In 1996, a criminally insane man shot to death 35 people at a Tasmanian resort. The government immediately responded by passing stringent gun control laws, banning most firearms, and ordering their confiscation. More than 640,000 guns were seized from ordinary Australian citizens.[10]

As a result, there was a sharp and dramatic increase in violent crime against the disarmed law-abiding citizens, who in small communities and particularly in rural areas were now unable to protect themselves from brigands and robbers. That same year in the state of Victoria, for example, there was a 300% increase in homicides committed with firearms. The following year, robberies increased by almost 60% in South Australia. By 1999, assaults had increased by almost 20% in New South Wales. Two years following the gun ban/confiscation, armed robberies had risen by 73%, unarmed robberies by 28%, kidnappings by 38%, assaults by 17%, and manslaughter by 29%, according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics.

As always with the Left, facts will not matter.

Hillary Wants to Give Lots of Free Stuff to Illegals

Yes, she’s got to pander to one of the Democrat mascot groups, offering not only health care, but anything else you can imagine. We’ve only scratched the surface of reasons that people should run from Hillary like the plague. Spread the word! We may have only one more election left!

Written by Teri O'Brien

Politics, Pop Culture, the Hottest Issues of the Day, the flagship show of the Informed America Radio network, the Teri O’Brien Show, featuring America’s Original Conservative Warrior Princess, Live and in vivid red, white and blue, Sundays 5-7 pm Eastern time (4-6 pm Central) at teriobrien.com and http://www.spreaker.com/show/the-teri-obrien-show, and anytime on demand on iHeart Radio, Stitcher Radio, and iTunes.

Image Courtesy of the Teri O'Brien Show

This article was first published in ClashDaily.com on October 24, 2015, and we think it is worth republishing in 2016.

Your rating: None Average: 5 (2 votes)
Comments on this post

The Threat of Communism Unrealized!

While I do not believe that we had "a communist in the White House" for the past 7 years, I do agree that there certainly were socialist and dictatorial tendencies shown by Obama. He has certainly attacked the core opposition to the almighty state. And I do not mean the Republican Party establishment opposition.

Religion, the family unit, state governments have all been attacked via Justice Dept lawsuits with endless taxpayer dollars and the full force of the federal government, men in the women's restrooms or visa versa through the threat of withholding US taxpayer money to schools 1-12 grades, transsexuals in the US Army, homosexual marriage pushed by Obama and passed by his appointees in the U.S. Supreme Court. The list goes on and on.

Communism may be terminally ill, yet the virus remains. First, CPUSA in January has more or less endorsed Sanders and Clinton on their website. Next, I read that the Communist Cuban dictator has endorsed Clinton. During more sane times the endorsement of a communist would be startling and likely detrimental to the endorsee, here Clinton. However, we have a youth today that have little education about the horror of communism. Consider the following from a recent poll:

"A slim majority of millennials, just 55% said they believe communism was and remains a problem in the world today, compared to 80% of baby boomers, and 91% of the World War II generation.

Nearly half of Americans between the ages of 16 and 20 said they would vote for a socialist, while 21% said they would vote for a communist candidate. Just 42% of millennials hold a favorable view of capitalism, and nearly one-third of younger Americans believe more people were killed under George W. Bush than perished under Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin, according a poll published Monday.

The survey also revealed a startling historical ignorance among younger generations of Americans. Fewer than half of millennials expressed a familiarity with notorious communist figures such as Mao Zedong (42%), Che Guevara (40%), and Vladimir Lenin (33%). A quarter of those expressing familiarity with Lenin said that had a favorable opinion of the Soviet leader.

Perhaps the most shocking result in the survey is the 32% of millennials who said they believed George W. Bush was responsible for more deaths than Joseph Stalin, who is estimated to have killed tens of millions during his time in power."

My apologies for such a lenghty quote, but I found it greatly illuminating. It explains so much about how an avowed socialist could get so many votes in a country that has gone the opposite path to economic freedom through capitalism for so many people. Why would 21% of Americans be for a system that has put million into slave camps, removed all freedoms, tortured political opposition, and murdered over 100 million people? Well, one because they actually do not know of the horrors of communism. Far too many millennials get their historical education from Hollywood. And how many Hollywood movies are produced annually about the history of communism?

How can nearly 50% of the younger crowd be for socialism, which is sinking into the swamps in Venezuela with the world's highest inflation while sitting on a fortune of oil? Then there is the current revolt against Brazil's socialism also. Do they never read a paper? Or is twitter their news source?

Bernie Sanders, the candidate of the millennials, has been reported joining the Young People’s Socialist League, which is the youth wing of the Socialist Party USA, and organized for a communist front, the United Packinghouse Workers Union in 1964.

In 1985 Sanders traveled to Communist Sandinistas in Nicaragua, praising their communist dictator while assailing the anti-communist leader of the free world President Reagan, who opposed the communists in the backyard of America. In 1988 Bernie took a honeymoon in Moscow, while the US was locked in an all out ideological "cold war" with her enemy USSR. In 1989 Sanders traveled to Communist Cuba to meet with US enemy Fidel Castro but was unsuccessful, so he met with the Havana mayor. And this is who the under 30 crowd backs!

Several years go I was in Australia in downtown Melbourne. A young man was passing out a flyer, and I was shocked to see the most familiar bald head of Vladimir Lenin on it. I took one from him and looked into his earnest eyes and asked: "Didn't you know communism failed?"

After several minutes of civil discussion I wore him down by pointing out the many horrors and some inherent flaws of communism. And he fell back on the only defense of the commies: "Well, true communism has never been tried." "After 100 million dead don't you think it is time to quit trying?" I asked.

The sad fact is my generation has done a lousy job of educating the young about what President Reagan called "the evil empire." Communist-leaning Hollywood, the overwhelming sympathetic media, actual Marxist professors have all helped in this lie of omission about communism. Somehow the "McCarthy card" can be spoken, and we who remember communism's evil are supposed to be silenced in red faced shame. Well, the fact is I will not be silenced. Roosevelt's government was saturated with communist spies at high levels, such as Alger Hiss and Harry Dexter White. There were actual communists in Hollywood too, as the young actor Ronald Reagan discovered.

In 2014 I was in Washington DC and I made my one objective there. I was most fortunate to go to the Victims of Communism memorial. Initially I could not locate it, so I went to the office building and was met by a charming woman who directed my wife and I to the memorial. It is not grand in size, but in this cold warrior's heart there is little bigger. I strongly urge everyone to take the time to visit this memorial when in D.C. and the website anytime. The following is taken from the Victims of Communism Website:

"The Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation (VOC) was established by unanimous act of Congress on December 17, 1993 and signed by President Bill Clinton (Public Law 103-199, Sec. 905). The act authorized VOC to construct, maintain, and operate in the District of Columbia an appropriate international memorial to honor the victims of communism. Today VOC carries on the original mission of ensuring that those victims are remembered and that the history of communist tyranny is known to future generations."
Excellent commentary, Koba, as usual. I did come back, but there is little left to say after such a savvy and informative comment — you have covered the subject so well. Let's just say that we can in fact conclude the communists have the Midas touch in reverse. They turn gold into manure: Cuba, Venezuela, etc., are good examples. And if communism has not been fully tried after 100 million hapless victims, what is left to be tried? More eggs to crack and no omelettes!

One word also about the millennials: they have been indoctrinated in leftism and ignorance, but there is still hope that their youth will pass and knowledge will be gain by the school of hard knocks!

As for Hollywood, you are also correct; where are the movies about the horrors of communism? Nowhere to be seen. Hollywood moguls are interested in defaming their own society, social engineering, the break down of the family (an obstacle to the omnipotence of the State), and making heroes out of losers and dysfunctional psychopaths, offering antiheroes as role models for our youth!