Immigration, truth and the delusional left by Russell L. Blaylock, M.D.

Exclusive for
Article Type: 
Published Date: 
Wednesday, February 8, 2017

It has been said that truth is the first causality of war and we have been at war with the collectivist elements for the past two hundred years. One among many demands by the delusional left is that we should have open borders and that protected borders and using a rational and legal method of choosing who can enter our country and become a citizen is un-American, heartless and evil. With fake tears in his eyes and in a trembling voice Senator Charles Schumer (D-NY) tried to convince the nation that protecting our borders is indeed un-American. The conscripted mind of the leftist followers all repeat this mantra unexamined, as if it is were an obvious reasoned idea.

To want to protect our borders from being invaded by hordes of other nations’ misfits, criminals, violent gangs and drug dealers as well as trained terrorist armies bent on our destruction, is considered mean spirited, heartless, cruel and — well, fascist by the deviant left. Now, to those of us who have actually read history, we know that using the term fascist to categorize one's enemy was engineered by Stalin to describe the members of the regime of his previous partner in world revolution, Hitler. The idea being to demonize his new turncoat enemy by using the name of a political ideology that he himself endorsed just a short time prior to Hitler’s betrayal. In fact, the new communist is a red fascist (by the Gramscian idea of the long march).

Even if we ignore the criminal and destructive elements that wish to enter our country, one must appreciate that our culture is still the freest, most productive and holds more opportunity for the individual than any other country in the world. To open our doors to the world would mean not thousands but tens of millions would flow into our country. Can we really suddenly, Immigration in Franceand with no chance of assimilation, accommodate 50 million or 100 million more people in our country? They would take away the jobs of our own citizens as is happening now and they would overwhelm our hospitals, clinics, welfare institutions, schools and housing availability, leaving Americans to pick up the bill. Already we have a number of hospitals that have had to close their doors because of the influx of illegal immigrants — leaving our citizens without local health care. It would mean every city would have whole sections of poor immigrants who couldn’t speak English, who were chronically unemployed and who have carried with them the primitive culture they came from — often a violent culture. This is happening right now in Europe and the UK (photo above).

The leftist elements are driving forth a program to destroy free speech, demonize its enemies, attack them physically as well as intellectually, and riot and burn at every opportunity — just as the fascists and communists have done throughout history. Hate speech in the leftist lexicon means anything that disagrees with their totalitarian idiocy. Recently, one of the leftist groups tweeted that they would not hesitate to kill the children of those who published anything opposed to their rambling hatred. One must ask the obvious question — Would you really want these people to rule you — to control society?

In this discussion, I only want to consider immigration of the Islamic believers. The Western nations agreed to accept millions of Islamic refugees on the basis of compassion for oppressed people. What seems to have escaped most defenders of this policy as well as the lethargic among our population is the question — Who exactly are they escaping? Are they escaping persecution and mass killing by Christians? By Nazis? By Europeans or Americans? No, they are escaping mass murder by their own religious believers in Islam — it is a religious civil war, a Jihad within a Jihad. In fact, since this war began they have slaughtered 90,000 Christians and sent millions into dangerous refugee camps. At the same time, they have killed several hundred thousand Muslims. Their principle enemy in the region includes those who have a slightly different Islamic belief — Shia vs Sunni. Why should we get in the middle of a religious war that in no way should concern Americans?

Because the Islamists have decided to fight among themselves and murder themselves in mass numbers they now, along with the leftists of the world, expect the Western nations to take them in as permanent residents. This is despite the fact they have publically and unendingly stated they seek to put the entire world under sharia law and under socialist Islamic rule. Further, they openly state that they plan to exterminate every Jew in the entire world — that they plan to complete Hitler’s original plan. In addition, all other religions are expected to convert to Islam or die or live in oppressive enclaves as third class citizens. In essence, they and their leftist followers, are insisting the West commit suicide and agree to the destruction of their culture.

The leftist followers cannot seem to grasp the notion that when millions of Islamists enter the United States they will hold in their hands the power to fundamentally change America, not just by violence, but by the power of the vote. France, Germany, Belgium, Sweden and Norway are under such an attack today; yet being leftist collectivists, many still cannot see it. Leftist followers always seem to have great difficulty learning the lessons of history — contemporary and ancient.

There is a video tape made by a former marine now Department of Defense contractor working in Iraq who makes the most powerful case for severely restricting immigration of Islamic believers. He describes sitting around with Islamic soldiers who are supposed to be our friends, discussing President Trump’s new temporary immigration halt from seven Islamic terrorist states (all chosen by Obama). They are in an angry uproar over the policy, expressing their view that it is a betrayal. He then asked them what would happen if he were to step outside their military compound into the city. They tell him, unashamedly, that he would be captured, tortured severely, and then killed by beheading, which would be videotaped. He then tells them — “If you don’t want me in your society — your country, why should I invite you into mine?” He then tells them — “You will have the same hatred for Americans once you are in my country that you express now.” He then points out that the people who would kill him were not ISIS or any other terrorist group; they were ordinary citizens of the country. 

My question would be — So then, why are we defending these people who hate us so much that they would torture and behead our soldiers? Why are our soldiers dying to defend these people? Why would we invite hordes of people who profess their hatred for everything Western into our country? Only a fool would do such a thing and the left are indeed fools. The vast majority of these immigrants are young men — most who are escaping military service; they are cowards. Yet, The Nazi Connection to Islamic Terrorismthey hate America. We must also keep in mind when these intellectual midgets in our country scream that we are fascists, that the Muslim Brotherhood was nurtured and turned into the force it has become in the Middle East by Hitler himself (photo, right). Historians of the era tell of seeing Hitler’s picture hanging on the wall in houses of millions of Arabs during Hitler’s rule. Further, Amin al-Husseini, former Grand Mufti of Jerusalem (1921-1937) and one of the principle founders of Arab fascism, was promised by Hitler rule of the Middle East once Hitler won the war. The idiot left is defending the real fascists — as usual.

President Trump and conservatives in general, have as the core of their principles, a belief in a central government of dramatically reduced size and scope, and maximization of the rights of the individual. The left, as a matter of principle, desires a powerful central government, suppression of the individual by the collective and absolute control of virtually every aspect of the individual’s life — what he shall eat, what he can wear, what job he well have, where he will live, his occupation, what information he shall have access to, and what beliefs he should be allowed to hold. The left is hell bent on destroying all traditions, cultural beliefs, Western institutions, religious understandings, and information that might in any way contradict the absolute insane beliefs they hold so dear. They have introduced a program of deviancy, cultural devastation and empowerment of every form of aberrant behavior known —including Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender (LGBT), postmodernism, a “living” Constitution, obliteration of the rule of law, and the end of free choice, compulsion with forced government mandates — emanating from their warped minds. During the confirmation hearings, I was appalled to listen to idiot leftist after idiot leftist ask these serious men as their main question how they intended to treat LGBT — they even asked the future secretary of the Department of Defense that question — as if everything hinged on their deviant sexual view.

I can only pray that the good Lord will give President Trump the guidance and strength to continue his quest to return this nation to sanity — to the principles that made it great.

References and Recommended Reading

1. Morse C. The Nazi Connection to Islamic Terrorism: Adolph Hitler and Haj Amin-Husserini. World Net Daily, Washington, D.C., 2010.

2. Blaylock RL. The Use of Propaganda and Psychological Warfare by the Left., August 8, 2016. Available from:

3. Blaylock RL. Confusion about Politics: Diversion as a leftist tactic. April 29, 2016. Available from:

Written by Russell L. Blaylock, MD

Dr. Russell L. Blaylock is President of Advanced Nutritional Concepts and Theoretical Neurosciences in Jackson, Mississippi. He has written numerous path-blazing scientific papers and many books, including Excitotoxins — The Taste That Kills (1994), Bioterrorism: How You Can Survive (2001), Health and Nutrition Secrets (2002), and Natural Strategies for Cancer Patients (2003). He is Associate Editor-in-Chief and a Consulting Editor in Basic Neuroscience for Surgical Neurology International (SNI).

This article may be cited as: Blaylock RL. Immigration, truth and the delusional left. February 8, 2017. Available from:

Copyright ©2017 Hacienda Publishing Inc.

Your rating: None Average: 5 (5 votes)
Comments on this post

Reply to Drs. Adam Bogart & Faria & Koba

Excellent points and one that I have been trying to tell the snowflakes for some time. Those with the power of observation and analysis, such as Koba and Miguel, realize that the communists (Leftists/collectivists) use all methods to weaken and eventually bring down a target country. This includes a massive influx of drugs, destruction of education, expansion of disease (through uncontrolled immigration), acts of terrorism, destruction of the culture (through movies, fiction, magazines and all other forms of writing), disregard for the rule of law, infiltration and destruction of all religions, destruction of business ethics and rampant political corruption.

Bernard Bailyn in his book The Ideological Origins of the American Revolution, noted many of the founders of America observed as far back as 1720s that England was in a state of increasing corruption, business ethics were deteriorating, there was almost complete disregard for the rule of law, and that the English constitution was in danger of becoming irrelevant— exactly what is now happening in the United Sates. They knew that if the English constitution was lost, then liberty in the colonies would be lost as well.

What the useful fools do not appreciate is that with the massive influx of Islamic radicals into Europe, and especially England, is that once they wrest political control of these countries the Islamic radicals will also own the military and control the nuclear weapons of each of these countries— which is substantial in terms of France and England. That will be a formidable enemy aligned against the United States when combined with the military might of Russia and China, and the US will stand alone in the world at that point.

What I have considered in my examination is that the communist elements are using the Islamic radicals as the destructive force to bring down the West— but once this is accomplished they will kill the mass of those that helped them, as the communists always do. They will select certain individuals among these rebels to work with them— that is, the non-religious Middle Eastern faker who is merely pretending to be religious. The mass of Islamic rebels, those who truly believe in the caliphate, will be a danger to the new ruling class of leftists and therefore will need to be eliminated. The nuclear weapons in these captured countries will be under the total control of the new Soviets— just as we saw during the cold war, when the Soviets absolutely controlled all antimissile batteries. In Vietnam and Syria at that time, all missile batteries were totally controlled by the Soviets.

Robert Conquest wrote an interesting book many years ago, What To Do When the Russians Come, in which he outlined that the first targets of the new Soviet victors will be the very ones who helped them defeat the United States— which will be the snowflakes, the idiot media hacks, the leftist politicians and the other useful fools.

It has been pointed out that one must be very careful in carrying out such plans of betrayal. Sometimes the monster one creates will turn on its master, as in Mary Shelley's Frankenstein. The Soviets and the Chinese are creating a very dangerous world that could get completely out of hand that could lead to Armageddon as described in the Bible.
Good points, Russell--- MAF

Yuri Bezenmov's 1984

In a 1984 TV interview, ex KGB agent and defector Yuri Bezenmov describes all of this, and not only is it surprising to find out how long the Soviets had been carrying out this subversion, but shocking to hear him describe everything you have mentioned, Russell.

I recall watching this many years ago late at night during a bout of insomnia and wishing I could somehow see it again to videotape it. Now, thanks to the wonder of YouTube, several of Bezenmov's interviews and speeches are available on line. Because they are numerous, I will not give any links, but rather just suggest to enter "Yuri Bezenmov" in the YouTube search box.

"Robert Conquest wrote an interesting book many years ago, What To Do When the Russians Come, in which he outlined that the first targets of the new Soviet victors will be the very ones who helped them defeat the United States— which will be the snowflakes, the idiot media hacks, the leftist politicians and the other useful fools."

This is also covered by Bezenmov when he discusses the KGB's plans to bring the Indian government under communism in the late 1960's. If those plans had been successful, there was a list being kept of the most fervent Indian supporters of the KGB subversive movement. It was intended that they were to be shot as one of the first matters on the agenda of the new government. --ARB

Post Script:

It is very important to note the reason Bezenmov gives as to why the most fanatical useful idiots will be gotten rid of first. It is because the communists know that these people are going to be the most horrified when they discover the newly installed "worker's paradise" is anything but. They are then most likely to revolt and become counter revolutionaries. Their execution is therefore merely a preemptive measure.

Lefty law student sums it up....

Dear Russell,
In regards to your article, a law student at Starbucks (where else?) when I was studying for my candidacy exams in grad school told me that borders around the US were unfair because it was merely an accident of birth that we were born in this great nation, and so why should others that weren't suffer for their bad luck?

I didn't even dignify that nonsense with a response, but I thought later how nice a country I found Italy. What if I found it so nice that I wanted to become an Italian citizen and live the rest of my life out there? Would he think it unfair that I could not just walk right into Italy and do this, because it was an accident of birth I was not born an Italian citizen in Italy?

Of course he wouldn't. That is all I need to say. --ARB

Excellent column: Immigration & the untouchable judiciary

Excellent column. Yes, we have indeed been at war with the collectivist for a long time indeed. But what is it that they want?

"The leftist followers cannot seem to grasp the notion that when millions of Islamists enter the United States they will hold in their hands the power to fundamentally change America." Although this likely holds true for the masses of the misled, the herd of non-thinkers, yet I firmly believe that the leadership in the leftist camp-- the George Soros and his clown puppet and their ilk-- know exactly the damage they do, as former President Obama did.

What is the endgame for the leftist? It should be noted that in Syria half the population has been displaced, there is no local police to investigate our incoming refugees, and one must expect a number of Muslim terrorists mixed in with the immigrants as ISIS has promised and delivered in Europe already. Why are they really so intent upon bringing in people who cannot be vetted to ascertain whether they are terrorists?

I think the answer is the same as the reason that the left wants open borders along the southern border: they hate this America and want it destroyed. So they attack the impediments to this goal in typical communist fashion by targeting religion, family, and national identity by forcing homosexual marriage; men in dresses in the military, dressing rooms, and restrooms; and illegal immigration over the objections of the majority of the American people.

A federal judge in Seattle, U.S. District Judge James Robart , can stop the enforcement of President Trump’s order halting immigration from countries identified as potential terrorist threats since refugees may face "immediate and irreparable injury.” If this is the standard to now be used, then no person from any country could be denied entry into the US. Moreover, Congress has recognized that the president clearly has the authority to decide who can come into the US over the many decades. This is not the purview of the court, but it illustrates the agenda of the left by further destroying our freedom-loving heritage and replacing it with a totalitarian, Islamic one. After all, the leftist love of Islam was once the love of all things Palestine, including all sorts of terrorists. The left may despise religion, because it contends with the god of Communists, Socialists, and the other collectivists — that is the All-Powerful State — but they will absolutely use the enemy (Islam, Palestine) of their enemy (US) as a means. After all, they can no longer root for the Vietcong or the USSR.

Then there is Obamacare. There are many reasons to oppose this; for example, forcing the people to buy a product by calling it a tax, dramatic and alarming premiums, and the withdrawal of major health insurers like Aetna and United Healthcare from Obamacare. However, the biggest concern for me is that Obamacare will destroy our private healthcare system, which accounts for about 1/5th the spending of the US economy. Then the government will have to step in and “rescue” it. Again, the State grows more powerful.

With the ending of Vietnam War many if not most of the Communists, Marxists, assorted and violent leftists began to move into the system that they had formerly sought to destroy. They took over the university professor positions, invaded the Democrat Party, and began to destroy the system through political means instead of Molotov cocktails, bombs, kidnappings, and murders. Weather Underground members William Ayers, Bernadine Dohrn, and Mark Rudd now teach in colleges. They moved from Weather Underground, SDS, Black Panthers, SLA, CPUSA to ACORN, Planned Parenthood, Democrat Socialists of America, ELF, and inevitably the Democrat Party.

While their means has changed, their goals remain the same: destroy the American system. Illegal immigration and open borders are one of many ways of accomplishing this.

Dr. Faria replies: And notice how the media is attacking Trump, the President of the United States & acting as if they were lamenting the criticism of the judge as an impeding constitutional crisis, as if had never happened in America:

" President Donald Trump's personal attack on the federal judge who blocked his controversial [my emphasis] travel executive order could undermine public confidence [my emphasis] in an institution capable checking his power, say legal experts.

"The fallout from Trump's Twitter tirade [my emphasis] against U.S. District Judge James Robart — in which he dismissed a respected jurist as a 'so-called judge' — continues to dog the new president." — NBC News.

Thomas Jefferson encouraged the House of Representatives to impeach Associate Justice of the Supreme Court Samuel Chase (1796-1811) when the judge expressed Federalist opinions in his rulings. Jefferson was even more critical of the Judiciary in general:

The germ of dissolution of our federal government is in the constitution of the federal Judiciary; an irresponsible body (for impeachment is scarcely a scare-crow) working like gravity by night and by day, gaining a little today and a little tomorrow, and advancing its noiseless step like a thief, over the field of jurisdiction, until all shall be usurped. (Letter to Charles Hammond, August 18, 1821)

And did we ever here the media criticize Obama for anything? Obama ever said anything "controversial," or did he ever "undermine public confidence"? Of course he did, but not, he was lionized and treated as an American royalty for everything he said or did! Yet, Obama sold out to Iran and Cuba, while criticizing our allies, UK, Turkey, and Israel; abandoned our ambassadors and staffers as in Libya; and undermined the very foundations of this nation. Obama undermined the confidence of just about anyone neutral in politics and knowledgeable of geopolitics — not to mention just about everybody I know!

Immigration selection?

Former application of immigration laws allowed for truly political refugees with friendly ties or former allies to the U.S. (for example the Cuba Adjustment Act of 1966), as well as selection of educated people with essential expertise and desired talents to enter the U.S. at an accommodating pace allowing for assimilation and for making contributions to the nation; but no more. Legal immigration is all now about partisan politics (for example Obama making capricious allowance for refugees from Islamic nations with ties to terrorism); and the Democrats are only interested in continuing immigration, legal or illegal, to add to their political power, which is the reason they are not interested in any restrictions or in ending voter fraud with the implementation of ID cards or any other method. Illegal immigration, of course, does not allow us to discriminate.

Some Republican businessmen are for increasing legal (and winking at illegal immigrants) immigration for the shortsighted exploitation of cheap labor. And the truth is that Mexicans do much of the work that, some of our own lazy fellow Americans will not do despite their scant education or technical skill, because of the magnanimity of the welfare state. I agree with President Trump’s attempted ban on immigration from countries with terrorist ties. Exceptions can be made on an individual cases based on essential expertise and documented proof of these individuals not being a threat to national security. ---MAF