Libertarian Principles

Author: 
William G. White, MD
Article Type: 
Correspondence
Issue: 
Spring 1997
Volume Number: 
2
Issue Number: 
2

Dear Editor,

Dr. Robert Carlen (Medical Sentinel, Winter 1997, page 5) states regarding abortion and euthanasia, “I think AAPS should follow its own libertarian principles instead of trying to get the government to interfere with the private decisions of patients and their doctors.” Dr. Carlen’s letter was magnificently answered by Dr. Orient and Dr. Faria, and I offer the following contribution to the conversation. I believe that the open exchange of ideas on these controversial issues does not weaken AAPS, but strengthens it.

As one whose opinions would probably be considered conservative socially and libertarian economically, I would disagree that libertarian principles allow for the legalization of abortion, euthanasia or any other killing of human beings, except those justly convicted of a capital crime, or who are enemies in a just war or in self-defense. (I distinguish between libertarian principles and the platform of the Libertarian Party.)

Libertarianism, as I understand it, does not call for no government, as does anarchism, but for limited government. Perhaps, today as we endure state and federal governments flooding far beyond the banks of reason, tradition, and constitution, it is tempting to try to restrict their functions in any way possible.

Government, however, does have legitimate purposes, namely the protection of life, liberty, and property. Without government, these fundamental rights of all are vulnerable to the predations of the strong. In such anarchic conditions might makes right, and freedom vanishes.

Thus, the legitimate purpose of the national government is the national defense, and that of state and local governments is the enforcement of laws prohibiting crimes against persons and property. All individual human beings, from conception to natural death, have an unalienable right, not granted by government, to the protection of these laws. Biologically, it is undeniable that, from the moment of fertilization, the embryo is an individual member of the human species. It is not for government or any other larger, stronger person to define away that individual’s fundamental rights by restricting legal “personhood,” whether on the basis of age, sex, race, or even citizenship.

Regarding euthanasia, the presumption of the state must always be for life, and even suicide has been traditionally prohibited. The wisdom of this prohibition is amply demonstrated by the current situation in Holland, where laws allowing supposedly voluntary euthanasia have led to widespread, well-documented, involuntary euthanasia.

The AAPS is entirely consistent with libertarian principles when it accepts a strictly circumscribed role for government in the defense of life, liberty and property.

William G. White, MD
Franklin Park, IL

Originally published in the Medical Sentinel 1997;2(2):41-42. Copyright ©1997Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS).

 

 

No votes yet

It is now legend the AAPS legally lanced the secret task force and pulled its secrets...into the sunshine. It destoyed the Health Security Act.


The Oath of Hippocrates
and the Transformation of Medical Ethics Through Time


Patients within a managed care system have the illusion there exists a doctor-patient relationship...But in reality, it is the managers who decide how medical care will be given.


Judicial activism...the capricious rule of man rather than the just rule of law.


The largest single problem facing American medicine today is the actions of government...


The lessons of history sagaciously reveal wherever governments have sought to control medical care and medical practice...the results have been as perverse as they have been disastrous.


Children are the centerpiece of the family, the treasure (and renewal) of countless civilizations, but they should not be used flagrantly to advance political agendas...


Prejudice against gun ownership by ordinary citizens is pervasive in the public health community, even when they profess objectivity and integrity in their scientific research.


The infusion of tax free money into the MSA of the working poor give this population tax equity with wealthier persons...


It was when Congress started dabbling in constitutionally forbidden activities that deficit spending produced a national debt!


Does the AMA have a secret pact with HCFA?


The lure of socialism is that it tells the people there is nothing they cannot have and that all social evils will be redressed by the state.


Canada's fatal error — Health Care as a Right!


The Cancer Risk from Low Level Radiation: A Review of Recent Evidence...


...Moreover, the gun control researchers failed to consider and underestimated the protective benefits of firearms.


Vandals at the Gates of Medicine — Have They Been Repulsed or Are They Over the Top?