Misguided Philosophies

Author: 
Robert P. Gervais, MD and Jerome C. Arnett, Jr., MD
Article Type: 
Correspondence
Issue: 
Summer 2002
Volume Number: 
7
Issue Number: 
2

Dear Dr. Arnett,

...The author of “Is there a Duty to Die” [philosophy professor John Hardwig, East Tennessee State University] utilized the same misguided arguments to “justify” death as those proposed centuries ago to defend the indefensible, namely, slavery.

Misguided philosophies redefine terms in order to justify the attainment of predetermined ends. That is to say, in order to justify the extermination of the sick human, the latter is conveniently redefined as a non-person. Likewise, in order to justify “people stealing” or slavery, misguided philosophies of yesteryear redefined black humans as less than persons or subhuman.

The redefinition of terms to suit the moment undergirds totalitarian or leftist ideology. For example, most laws passed by all current governments are arrogantly declared to be “just” not because they are per se just but because government says this or that law is just. It is a throw back to Louis XIV who pompously stated, L’Etat, C’est Moi (“The state, it is I”).

Robert P. Gervais, MD
Mesa, AZ

Dr. Arnett Responds:

Dear Dr. Gervais,

The problem you noted in your January 3, 2002, letter is a manifestation of our subjective (utilitarian) philosophy with its politics of socialism and its population-based ethics relying on altruism (not benevolence).

All bioethicists reject the lessons of history and the teachings of Objectivist philosophy. So they must blur the distinction between animals and humans (never mind the faculties of reason), change the meaning of terms (language), use confusing and emotive ideas, and flawed reasoning — gobbledegook, subterfuge and double-talk. Of course, they reject individual rights.

The Summer 2002 issue of the Medical Sentinel is on ethics.

Jerome C. Arnett, Jr., MD
Elkins, WV


 

 

 

Your rating: None Average: 5 (2 votes)
Comments on this post

Altruism or hypocrisy! Part 1

Left-wing altruism call it in many cases hypocrisy!

VP Joe Biden gives almost nothing to charity, and yet incessantly calls Republicans greedy. Tim Geitner is a tax cheat; Charlie Rangel is corrupt; and the greatest hypocritical megalomanic (after George Soros)– Warren Buffet, the "patriotic millionaire"– is a self-serving, publicity-seeker, who owes a billion in back taxes, and yet for media consumption says the rich should pay more. And Bill Clinton sent his old under-wears to charity, $2 a shot; he should have sent them to a burlesque museum!

Buffet makes astoundingly PC, hypocritical statements purely to be quoted and his picture printed. Truly philanthropic people, do not go to the media in bombastic fashion for self-promotion, as he does repeatedly and continues to do for self-promotion. No money in the world can buy him the propaganda he is getting from those comments. 

Truly altruistic people do the good deeds with little fanfare, like Mother Teresa and myriads of others in food kitchens, missions, not to mention friends and neighbors in need.

These self-promoting millionaires are free to donate their whole fortunes without waiting for the government to take it away from them, or push the state to take away from others! Altruism in search of self-promotion is not philanthropy, but hypocritical, selfish greed in disguise, not beneficence.

There is no better philanthropy than enlightened self-interest, as when Thomas Edison developed the light bulb and Alexander Graham Bell the telephone, and we all benefited, while they became rich! MAF


It is now legend the AAPS legally lanced the secret task force and pulled its secrets...into the sunshine. It destoyed the Health Security Act.


The Oath of Hippocrates
and the Transformation of Medical Ethics Through Time


Patients within a managed care system have the illusion there exists a doctor-patient relationship...But in reality, it is the managers who decide how medical care will be given.


Judicial activism...the capricious rule of man rather than the just rule of law.


The largest single problem facing American medicine today is the actions of government...


The lessons of history sagaciously reveal wherever governments have sought to control medical care and medical practice...the results have been as perverse as they have been disastrous.


Children are the centerpiece of the family, the treasure (and renewal) of countless civilizations, but they should not be used flagrantly to advance political agendas...


Prejudice against gun ownership by ordinary citizens is pervasive in the public health community, even when they profess objectivity and integrity in their scientific research.


The infusion of tax free money into the MSA of the working poor give this population tax equity with wealthier persons...


It was when Congress started dabbling in constitutionally forbidden activities that deficit spending produced a national debt!


Does the AMA have a secret pact with HCFA?


The lure of socialism is that it tells the people there is nothing they cannot have and that all social evils will be redressed by the state.


Canada's fatal error — Health Care as a Right!


The Cancer Risk from Low Level Radiation: A Review of Recent Evidence...


...Moreover, the gun control researchers failed to consider and underestimated the protective benefits of firearms.


Vandals at the Gates of Medicine — Have They Been Repulsed or Are They Over the Top?