Vermont's Health Insurance Mess

Author: 
John McClaughry
Article Type: 
Report from the States
Issue: 
July/August 2000
Volume Number: 
5
Issue Number: 
4

Skyrocketing health insurance rates for Vermonters is the result of a decade of unwise political interventions in the insurance market, according to a new report issued by the Ethan Allen Institute.

The report, "Reviving Health Insurance in Vermont," traces the history of Vermont's collapsing insurance market since 1984. According to that report, today's moribund market is the direct result of a 1991 state bailout of then-failing Blue Cross, the 1994 plan to create a single-payer scheme and Gov. Howard Dean's fallback strategy of adding costly coverage mandates and constantly expanding (but not paying for) government health care programs.

Medicaid now covers 20 percent of all Vermonters under 65, about twice the national average. Children from families of over $50,000 income now have their medical bills paid by taxpayers --- in other words, socialized medicine step-by-step, through the back door. Families which formerly had private insurance drop it, so they can get "free," government-provided coverage.

The report compares individual insurance rates for the same family in Anderson IN, Norman OK, and Burlington VT. While the difference in policy terms makes a strict comparison impossible, it is clear that the Vermont family of four is paying dramatically more for coverage than families in the other states.

The report offers 15 specific recommendations for reviving the competitive market. Chief among them are the encouragement of tax favored Medical Savings Accounts (MSAs), a repeal of "community rating," legalization of healthy lifestyle discounts, full payment to doctors and hospitals for Medicaid patients, a high-risk pool for the medically uninsurable, and support for Vermont's nine community-based free clinics.

Mr. McClaughry is president of the Ethan Allen Institute, Vermont's free market, public policy research and education organization. E-mail address: eai@ethanallen.org.

Originally published in the Medical Sentinel 2000;5(4);144. Copyright©2000 Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS)

No votes yet

It is now legend the AAPS legally lanced the secret task force and pulled its secrets...into the sunshine. It destoyed the Health Security Act.


The Oath of Hippocrates
and the Transformation of Medical Ethics Through Time


Patients within a managed care system have the illusion there exists a doctor-patient relationship...But in reality, it is the managers who decide how medical care will be given.


Judicial activism...the capricious rule of man rather than the just rule of law.


The largest single problem facing American medicine today is the actions of government...


The lessons of history sagaciously reveal wherever governments have sought to control medical care and medical practice...the results have been as perverse as they have been disastrous.


Children are the centerpiece of the family, the treasure (and renewal) of countless civilizations, but they should not be used flagrantly to advance political agendas...


Prejudice against gun ownership by ordinary citizens is pervasive in the public health community, even when they profess objectivity and integrity in their scientific research.


The infusion of tax free money into the MSA of the working poor give this population tax equity with wealthier persons...


It was when Congress started dabbling in constitutionally forbidden activities that deficit spending produced a national debt!


Does the AMA have a secret pact with HCFA?


The lure of socialism is that it tells the people there is nothing they cannot have and that all social evils will be redressed by the state.


Canada's fatal error — Health Care as a Right!


The Cancer Risk from Low Level Radiation: A Review of Recent Evidence...


...Moreover, the gun control researchers failed to consider and underestimated the protective benefits of firearms.


Vandals at the Gates of Medicine — Have They Been Repulsed or Are They Over the Top?