Crackdown on illegal immigrants? We've been here before, and farmers suffered by Charles E. Richardson

With all the furor over illegal immigration a little history lesson might be in order. As you are probably aware, President Donald Trump has taken another bite out of the illegal immigration apple, I think it’s his third. First he signed an executive order to build a border wall that’s estimated to cost $21.6 billion. Mexico has already told him it's not paying for it so Trump has threatened our southern neighbor with other measures. Trump has also said he wants to hire 15,000 more Border Patrol officers and Immigration and Custom Enforcement agents.

His second bite came in the form of another executive order that was aimed at seven predominantly Muslim countries, but was so ill-conceived that it caught up travelers with valid visas. That effort remains halted by the federal courts.

Now comes his third bite. He’s decided to aggressively enforce our nation’s immigration laws, enlist local law enforcement to help do the job of immigration enforcement, speed up deportations, open new detention centers and expand the definition of criminal activity to include minor violations. These actions should come as no surprise, Trump is doing what he said he would do and the people who voted for him are cheering. I’m not here to debate whether strict enforcement of our immigration laws are right or wrong, but here’s where the history lesson comes in.

Migrant workers pick onions in GeorgiaIt was May, 1998, the sweet Vidalia onion fields had been prepared for harvest — a harvest of some of the tastiest onions in the world. A harvest worth $60 million at the time. That’s when 45 Immigration and Naturalization Service agents swooped in unannounced raiding farms and packing sheds in Toombs and Tattnall counties. Word spread of the raids and workers disappeared into the woods and didn’t return. For three days this valuable crop sat roasting in the hot south Georgia sun before a compromise could be reached between the farmers and the INS.

As reported in The Telegraph, eight members of Congress signed an angry letter drafted by then U.S. Rep. Saxby Chambliss, R-Moultrie to Agriculture Secretary Dan Glickman, Labor Secretary Alexis Herman and Attorney General Janet Reno, concerning the INS raids. Republican U.S. Sen. Paul Coverdell, Republican U.S. Reps. Jack Kingston and Charlie Norwood and Democratic Rep. Sanford Bishop also signed the letter, protesting “the apparent lack of regard for farmers in this situation and the intimidation tactics being employed by federal officials.” Coverdell called the INS action “the worst of bully government.”

Let’s fast forward to 2011 when the Georgia General Assembly got all caught up and passed House Bill 87. It authorized law enforcement to demand immigration documentation from people they suspected where here illegally and detain them, even if they were stopped for a simple violation. There were also stiffer penalties for businesses that hired illegal immigrants.

Guess what happened? Exactly what you would expect. The law worked. Illegal immigrants left Georgia, but according to a UGA study, farmers were left holding the bag because they had only 60 percent of the work force needed to pick their crops costing them millions of dollars. In 2012, according to the University of Georgia’s College of Agriculture & Environmental Sciences, the farm gate value of just the onion crop was $163 million. Agriculture is our state’s No. 1 industry bringing $74 billion to our state’s economic table according to the Georgia Farm Bureau.

Unlike in 2011, when workers could just avoid Georgia, Trump’s crackdown is nationwide. So what are the unintended consequences? Again, let’s look at history. When the raids occured in south Georgia in 1998, the illegals left. In 2011, with HB 87, they left. With this crackdown they will either leave or fall into the shadows. Some folks will say, “That’s alright by me,” until that delicious Georgia peach ends up costing $4.50, if you can find one.

You’ve heard people say Americans will do work now being done by illegals. They tried that in 2011. It didn’t work and I know why. I’ve been on Bracero buses and picked tomatoes, onions and asparagus. It’s hard and hot work. Bluntly put, Americans are too soft — and too slow. And besides, farmers’ business models are built around cheap but experienced labor and if that labor isn’t around, there’s no need to plant what they can’t pick. Think about that.

Charles E. Richardson is The Telegraph’s editorial page editor. He can be reached at (478) 744-4342 or via e-mail at

This article may be cited as: Richardson CE. Crackdown on illegal immigrants? We've been here before, and farmers suffered. The Telegraph, Macon, Georgia, February 25, 2017. Available from:


Your rating: None Average: 5 (1 vote)
Comments on this post

Why not use penal inmates to do work?

Mike Ratliff (Feb 26): Americans can't do the work because they don't have to. Easy money can be made from welfare. If something is not done, the immigrants will eventually learn how to work the system. Cheap labor is not cheap. Add the cost burden of schools, healthcare and other public services.

Michael Anderson (Feb 27): So Charles. Why can't we use the prison population? They should have to EARN their free medical, dental care & food. All though I have a good idea what you would say, please pin a article on why this would be wrong!

Charles Richardson, Editorial Page Editor, the Telegraph (Macon) Feb. 28: Farmers need roughly 30,000 farm workers to pick our crops in Georgia. The shortage in 2011 when the state passed HB 87 was about 11,000. Other states have tried prison labor and so has Georgia. But here's the question: who gets paid? Certainly the state could make the claim that it is just being reimbursed for prisoners room and board, but it opens up a host of legal questions hardening back to the chain gang days. And, sad to say, the illegal aliens are better and faster at picking our crops than prisoners could ever be. And oh, one more point. The illegals spend a portion of their earnings in the communities where they work, not so with prisoners.

Allow work but limit, discriminate, and select best immigrants!

As I've stated be previously, former application of immigration laws allowed for truly political refugees with friendly ties or former allies to the U.S. (for example the Cuba Adjustment Act of 1966), as well as selection of wanted talent, educated people with essential expertise should be selected for U.S. immigration and at an accommodating pace allowing for assimilation. Unfortunately immigration is all now about partisan politics— for example Obama making capricious allowance for refugees from Islamic nations with ties to terrorism, supposedly for humanitarian purposes; but the same can be made for just about any nation in the world!

And his fellow Democrats are only interested in continuing immigration, legal or illegal, when it is calculated to add to their political power, which is the reason they are not interested in any restrictions or in ending voter fraud with the implementation of ID cards or any other method. Illegal immigration, of course, does not allow us to discriminate. Democrats do not seem to care whether freebooters, terrorists, or dangerous criminals enter the country as long as there is a chance they will eventually vote for the Democrats to obtain free loot.

Some Republican businessmen are for increasing legal (and winking at illegals) immigration for the shortsighted exploitation of cheaper labor. And the truth is that Mexicans do much of the work that, some of our own lazy fellow Americans will not do despite their scant education or technical skill. Why? Because of the magnanimity of the welfare state.

I agree with President Trump’s attempted ban on immigration from countries with terrorist ties. Exceptions can be made on an individual cases based on essential expertise and documented proof of these individuals not being a threat to national security. As for my fellow Hispanics, as I noted elsewhere, they might be needed more than our fellow conservatives realize.

Incidentally, I think the point of the prisoners working, chain gang style, is an excellent and easily workable idea. The mechanics of who gets paid can be worked out and legislated, no major problem. It would help the farmers immensely at affordable prices and reduce the need for migrant workers. Have the chain gang work in Georgia ceased since Governor Zell Miller instituted it sometime back?